February 6, 2012 No Comments

The Scientific Process

Since learning about Andrea Rossi’s E-Cat reactor, I’ve continued to read about its progress. I still see the lack of coverage in North American media as a problem because it is important for new, possibly game-changing technologies and scientific advancements to be publicized so that others can investigate them, as I said in my previous post. Here’s an example of what that process looks like via Steven B. Krivit’s New Energy Times blog: http://news.newenergytimes.net/. Indeed, Krivit continues to expose any aspects of Rossi’s work that are unprovable or fraudulent.

I am sure (and you can tell this is true if you read some of the news snippets) that this process is uncomfortable for Rossi and his colleagues. It should be.

Science is nothing if it cannot be scrutinized and validated. Unless independent researchers can replicate any process, the conclusion is that it simply doesn’t work. Rossi can certainly provide a “black box” version of his reactor to reputable scientists to test and evaluate. His proprietary processes can be protected. So he should have no qualms about offering up his discovery to independent review.

Scientific investigation is not easy, but it is necessary. I need only mention Thalidomide to make it clear that lack of complete research and testing has devastating consequences. Nobody wants to waste time, energy, or money on something that does not live up to its claims, nor rush to market something that has not been thoroughly investigated.

But we also need to give new technologies a chance. Prototypes don’t always work perfectly. Small scale versions of what should be much larger mechanisms can obscure results. Incorrect conclusions can be drawn from tests that aren’t adequately designed, monitored, or executed. Unexpected results can occur if all the variables are not rigorously accounted for and controlled.

That’s why broad interest and attention is necessary. Anything with the potential to radically change our world for the better needs to be analyzed by major reputable scientific and technical authorities. A couple of prestigious university labs should be sufficient. There are organizations with the resources to determine if Rossi’s claims have merit. They should take up the challenge and do so. This is too important to ignore.

December 5, 2011 No Comments

New Reactor Promises Clean Energy

Andrea Rossi has convincingly demonstrated his E-Cat reactor that produces more energy from a reaction than from a purely chemical process. Nickel plus hydrogen, 80 watts in, 15,000 watts out and no radioactive residue to get rid of afterward, only a little copper.

Strangely, the scientific press are remaining silent on this discovery. Perhaps having been burned by previous “cold fusion” claims that remained unproven, they are twice shy. However, when scientific heavyweights no less than Nobel prize winner for Physics Brian Josephson of Cambridge University talk about an invention, we need to pay attention. Rossi is clearly on to something. Given the size of the reaction chamber, it can’t be other than…fusion.

I am surprised that the scientific media are declining to cover this story. It is their responsibility to publicize science news so that the broader scientific community can become aware, then question, probe, investigate and even validate any claims. If something attracts the attention and support of respected scientists such as Josephson it deserves its moment in the spotlight.

According to NASA Chief Scientist Dennis M. Bushnell, reactors of the Rossi type are already in production and may be capable of “completely changing geo-economics, geo-politics, and solving climate and energy.”

Video on UCAM site with transcript.